La page perso de Laurent Mahieux
Strictly Speaking
THEY WRITE |THEY MEAN
---------------------------------------+-------------------------------
It has long been known that... |I haven't bothered to look up
|the original reference
...of great theoretical and practical |...interesting to me
importance
While it has not been possible to |The experiments didn't work
provide definite answers to these |out, but I figured I could at
questions. |least get a publication out
|of it.
The W-Pb system was chosen as |The fellow in the next lab had
especially suitable to show the |some already made up
predicted behavior...
High purity... |Composition unknown except
Very high purity... |for the exaggerated claims of
Extremely high purity... |the supplier
Super-purity... |
Spectroscopically pure... |
A fiducial reference line... |A scratch
Three of the samples were |The results of the others
chosen for detailed study... |didn't make sense and were
|ignored..
...handled with extreme care during |...not dropped on the floor
the experiments |
Typical results are shown... |The best results are shown...
Although some detail has been lost |It is impossible to tell from
in reproduction, it is clear from the |the micrograph
original micrograph that... |
Presumably at longer times... |I didn't take the time to find out
The agreement with the predicted |fair
curve is excellent |
good |poor
satisfactory |doubtful
fair |imaginary
...as good as could be expected |non-existent
These results will be reported at |I might get around to this
a later date |sometime
The most reliable values are those |He was a student of mine
of Jones |
It is suggested that... |
It is believed that... |I think...
It may be that... |
It is generally believed that.... |I have such a good objection
|to this answer that I shall
|now raise it.
It is clear that much additional |I don't understand it
work will be required before a |
complete understanding... |
Unfortunately, a quantitative theory |Neither does anybody else
to account for these effects has not |
been formulated |
Correct within an order of magnitude |Wrong
It is to be hoped that this work |This paper isn't very good
but will stimulate further work |neither are any of the others
in the field |on this miserable subject
Thanks are due to Joe Glotz for |Glotz did the work and Doe
assistance with the experiments and |explained what it meant.
to John Doe for valuable discussions. |
[Ed: Source: C.D. Graham Jr. Metal Progress, 71 pg 75 (1957)]